|
May 2001
ATLANTA Merck scientists recently unveiled data from a
3-month preliminary study geared toward creating an HIV-1 vaccine.
Merck is using Tranzfect technology, a delivery system for
DNA-based vaccines first developed by CytRx Corporation, to test different
vaccine regimens in rhesus monkeys. For the study, a highly virulent SHIV (a
combination of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus) was used. The vaccines
tested were not designed to prevent against SHIV infection, but to slow the
progression of SHIV to AIDS. Researchers said the vaccines produced a specific
cellular response that reduced the severity of SHIV infection, while slowing
the progression to AIDS and death. Researchers were encouraged to find that one
vaccine tested (CytRxs CRL-1005 compound) reduced plasma levels and
maintained CD4 cell count after SHIV infection.
NOORDWIJK, Netherlands A series of preliminary results
from several studies, announced at the International Workshop on HIV Clinical
Pharmacology here suggest that a simplified regimen might be effective in
controlling HIV.
Researchers looking at the efficacy of once-daily treatment with
saquinavir (Fortovase, Roche) plus a mini-dose of ritonavir (Norvir, Abbot)
have found that the one-a-day treatment produces results similar to the
three-a-day treatment.
In an ongoing study, Fortovase is administered to
treatment-naïve HIV-positive patients once daily in 1,600 mg doses along
with 100 mg of ritonavir and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
At week four, the Fortovase regimen showed higher levels of concentration in
patients and more time covered within 24 hours than previously observed in the
currently approved dosage. Levels of tolerability were also high. The most
common side effects reported were nausea, diarrhea, vomiting and headache.
In a separate study, 66 patients switched from twice daily
Fortovase (1,400 mg) to once daily Fortovase (1,600 mg). At week 24, 100% of
patients recorded HIV RNA levels below 400 copies/mL, while 92% maintained a
plasma viral load below 50 copies/mL. In the group, the median CD4 cell count
increased by 157 cells after 24 weeks.
ISTANBUL, Turkey According to recently presented data, the
use of efavirenz (Sustiva, DuPont) continues to provide greater viral
suppression through three years of follow-up than use of a protease inhibitor.
Additionally, when Sustiva is substituted for a protease inhibitor, patients
experience greater suppression of viral load.
According to data presented at the European Congress of Clinical
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 52% of patients from a 1997 study show a
reduction of viral load to less than 50 copies/mL compared to 30% in a protease
inhibitor-containing regimen. At 144 weeks of follow up, 55% of patients taking
Sustiva, AZT and 3TC had viral load less than 400 copies/mL, while 34% of
patients taking indinavir (Crixivan, Merck), AZT and 3TC showed similar
results.
Sustiva is similarly effective when it used to replace a protease
inhibitor-containing regimen. In one study, patients with two years experience
in protease inhibitor therapy were randomly switched to Sustiva plus two
nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The results show that 95% of
patients on the Sustiva therapy maintained a viral load of less than 50
copies/mL compared with 74% on the protease therapy. Additionally, Sustiva
patients were less likely to discontinue treatment due to adverse effects.
|