| |
December 2001
As regular readers know, the December issue of Infectious
Disease News has become a time of reflection and looking back over the
year past. This year, again, we offer the selection of top 10 infectious
disease stories published during the year, as selected by members of the
editorial board. We would not presume to rank-order them, so in no particular
order, here they are:
- Vaccine-associated polio outbreak in Haiti
- Keeping out BSE and vCJD
- Ebola virus outbreak in Uganda finally contained
- IOM Committee finds no link between MMR vaccine and autism
- Evidence against a relationship between hepatitis B vaccine and
MS
- Developing linezolid resistance
- Spreading viruses: dengue, hantavirus, West Nile virus
- Bioterrorism
- Hepatitis G may improve HIV survival rates
- EIS is 50 years old
Several of these topics have appeared on our top 10
list in prior years; others are brand new. The updated stories appear in a
special section of this issue. Some comments follow about these stories, as
well as some that do NOT appear on the list.
Bioterrorism stands out as the most shocking story of the year.
The anthrax outbreak appears finally to be subsiding, and a great deal of new
information has been gleaned already. Notable is the relatively low (40%)
mortality rate among the first 10 cases of inhalational anthrax, and the
inference that modern hospital care and antibiotic therapy can reduce the
mortality rate in this disease, previously documented to be >80%.
Also notable is the stunning efficiency of spore distribution within the U.S.
mail system.
Of greatest concern is the fact that we are just as susceptible
to this kind of terrorist event today as we were 2 months ago! Attention is
turning to other infectious agents that might pose a threat, most notably
smallpox. The surveillance and ring vaccination approach to global
smallpox eradication, used with striking success in developing countries 3
decades ago, was announced by CDC as its initial plan for containing smallpox,
should there be such an event in the United States. Whether this approach would
work as well in a highly mobile society such as ours as it worked in relatively
immobile populations in the developing world 30 years ago is not known. One
hopes that this question will never need to be answered.
The EIS 50th anniversary story is surely closely linked to the
previous story, for CDC has been very much in the center of the investigation.
(It probably also reflects the fact that a number of editorial board members
are EIS alumni!) Ironically, one of Alex Langmuirs major justifications
for initiating the Epidemic Intelligence Service was to enhance preparedness
for biowarfare, a great concern as the Cold War evolved after WWII; 50 years
elapsed before this capability was needed. Critics are already examining
CDCs performance in the anthrax event, and while there were
some missteps, to be sure, and a lot of mid-course learning and correcting, CDC
in general acquitted itself well.
![[bar]](../art/gradient.gif) Emerging infections in
2001
Several stories deal with emerging or spreading
viruses. The largest reported outbreak of Ebola hemorrhagic fever was finally
contained in Uganda, after continuing for 6 months or more, and involving 425
patients and 224 deaths. The second story deals with the spread of arbovirus
infections to new locations, dengue to Hawaii, hantavirus infection to New
England, and West Nile virus down the East Coast to Florida and Georgia. Such
virus spread undoubtedly will continue, and surprise us even more as the
population grows and as the virus and vectors adapt to new environments.
Fortunately, none of these viruses (except possibly Ebola) show any propensity
for person-to person spread via the respiratory route.
The outbreak of OPV-derived type 1 polio is worrisome, of course,
and vividly illustrates what can happen when populations are incompletely or
inadequately immunized and when OPV continues to be used. This outbreak is a
strong argument for immunizing the entire population at risk and maintaining a
high level of immunity; of course, it can also be an argument for switching to
IPV.
Two other stories represent vaccine science with negative
results, ie, the conclusion of an IOM committee that there was no link between
MMR vaccine (M-M-R II, Merck) and the development of autism, and the other
reporting two investigations published in The New England Journal of
Medicine that could identify no link between hepatitis B vaccine and
demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis. The MMRautism link has
gained a following in England, and the hepatitis B vaccine/MS link spread in
France. Although it is certainly beneficial to have such negative data
available, the sad truth is that many of the vaccine dissidents
simply do not accept scientific evidence as truth, and will never
believe that there was any other cause for their own or their loved ones
condition, however persuasive the evidence might be.
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy is an old-timer on this list.
The top 10 tradition is really only 5 years old and was first done
in 1996; BSE was on that list, too. Although there were no startling new
scientific developments, the topic remains of great concern because of the
continuing spread of BSE to countries in which it has not previously been
identified, ie, Japan, and because of the continuing importation of possibly
contaminated animal protein and by-products into this country. A page 1 story
in the Wall Street Journal on Nov. 28, 2001, detailed just how
porous our borders are, and did not make reassuring reading. A
blood/serum/urine test to detect BSE-infected cattle remains the holy
grail for this disease for the present.
Linezolid resistance came as no surprise, but the speed with
which it appeared did provide a surprise, and an unpleasant one. Risk factors
facilitating the appearance of resistance are well known by now, but are
reinforced by this report; they include the presence of an indwelling
prosthetic device, long-term therapy, suboptimal dosing, and of greatest
importance, undrained pus.
The only AIDS/HIV story on the list (surprising in itself) is a
very tantalizing one, that is, the apparent protection against lethality
conferred by co-infection with both hepatitis G (GBV-C) and HIV. Further
studies of this phenomenon will surely enhance our understanding of the
immunopathogenesis of HIV infection, and possibly provide important clues about
new targets for drug/vaccine development.
![[bar]](../art/gradient.gif) One worth mentioning
Finally, one story not on the list that merits brief comment is
the report of the field trial and now the licensure of recombinant activated
protein C (drotrecogin a )
for severe sepsis. The sponsor, Eli Lilly, has mounted an extensive promotional
effort to introduce this product. It seems to have attracted little interest
within the ID community, probably reflecting the fact that most ID physicians
do not function as critical care physicians, with a few exceptions. The product
clearly brings about a modest ( ±20%) but real reduction in mortality
from severe sepsis. I believe this is noteworthy for 3 reasons. First is that
it represents the first success for recombinant immune modulators after a
series of 5-6 strikeouts in the past. Second, even if not a home run, it is at
least a solid single. And finally, other recombinant products are being
developed that work at a number of different sites in the inflammatory cascade,
and may prove even more effective, perhaps in combination, in treating the
systemic inflammatory response syndrome. |