|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
June 2005 The Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee of the FDA recommended accelerated approval of the investigational HIV protease inhibitor (PI) tipranavir (Aptivus, Boehringer Ingelheim) for the treatment of HIV in drug-resistant patients. Last month the committee convened to review safety and efficacy data, and while the decision passed by an 11 to 3 vote in favor of accelerated approval, those who voted yes expressed caution and stressed that further studies should be conducted. As a committee, we have agreed there is efficacy demonstrated, but the exact usefulness of this drug needs to be monitored in the future, said Janet Englund, MD, the committees chair and associate professor at the University of Washington in Seattle. The committee specifically highlighted the need for future studies that focus on how to monitor and manage adverse events, such as long-term liver toxicities. Most members felt the benefits outweighed the potential risks, and physician monitoring could control them. The FDA granted tipranavir priority six-month review in February 2005 after Boehringer Ingelheim submitted New Drug Application (NDA) 21-814 (tipranavir, 250 mg capsules) in December 2004. If approved, tipranavir would become the second marketed non-peptidic PI nelfinavir (Viracept, Pfizer) was the first, approved in 1997. Tipranavir requires boosting with low-dose (200 mg) ritonavir (Norvir, Abbott) and must be used in combination with other antiretroviral agents. It is currently in late phase-3 clinical development. The committee based its recommendation on 24-week efficacy data from two phase-3 clinical trials, RESIST-1 and RESIST-2. RESIST-1 included 620 people and was conducted in Australia, Canada and the United States; RESIST-2, a sister-study, included 863 people from Europe and Latin America. These trials found that tipranavir showed evidence of antiviral effect in PI-resistant patients over currently approved and available antiretroviral regimens. Researchers conducted both studies in PI-resistant treatment-experienced patients. These patients had taken three classes of anti-HIV drugs and were failing their PI-based regimen at the time of study entry. RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 examined the treatment response of tipranavir boosted with ritonavir vs. a comparator group, where patients received one of several marketed ritonavir-boosted PIs. In addition, patients in both arms received an optimized background regimen of other antiretroviral drugs. Based on available clinical and in vitro data, tipranavir boosted with ritonavir appeared to retain activity against many strains of HIV that are resistant to available PIs; however, some adverse events were associated with use, and the committee had many concerns.
|
![]()