|
December 2005
ATLANTA Federal authorities recently proposed changes
affecting travelers that authorities believe would make it easier for public
health officials to keep infectious diseases out of the United States, they
announced at a teleconference held late last month.
We would like to use this opportunity to formally put
forward that CDC today proposed some critical updates to existing regulations,
which will allow our agency and HHS to move more swiftly to control potential
outbreaks of infectious disease that may result from international importation
or interstate movement, said Martin Cetron, MD, director of the division
of global migration and quarantine at the CDC.
![[bar]](../art/gradient.gif) Maintain manifests
Under the new rules, airlines and ship operators would be required
to report passengers who have certain symptoms of infectious diseases and to
maintain passenger lists, including name, seat location and emergency contact
information, for at least 60 days after arrival into the United States,
according to the CDC. If requested, this information must be submitted quickly
and electronically to the CDC. The new rules pertain to international travel,
as well as travel between larger cities, he said.
These will enable a more rapid advance notification of ill
passengers upon arrival and prior to arrival, Cetron said.
In the past, notification of significant public health events
occurred after passengers disembarked from planes and ships, leaving
investigators to reconstruct an itinerary, a manifest, a seating chart and any
contact information based on scant information. Because of the volume of
international travel, some of the early electronic records of those manifests
were purged within 24 or 48 hours. So the records were often reconstructed by
hand.
It wouldnt include sufficient contact information for
public health authorities to actually find that person and intervene within the
incubation period, Cetron explained.
Often, investigators used handwritten customs declaration forms to
identify contact information. This was an extremely time-consuming
process even for a single flight and almost hopelessly unsuccessful when we had
to deal with large multiple fights and large volume contact tracing as occurred
during SARS, he added.
So the specific changes are requirements that passenger
manifests be maintained by airlines in electronic format for 60 days after the
final destination of that journey; that at the request of public health that
information needs to be turned over in less than a day, by and large in 12
hours of that request; and that the information be turned over to public health
authorities electronically and that specific fields be included to allow for
effective contact tracing, he said.
This would enable public intervention if someone needed
postexposure vaccination or medication, or needed to be isolated or quarantined
to prevent the spread of disease.
![[bar]](../art/gradient.gif) Symptoms to be reported
The proposed rules also expand the definition of ill travelers
that must be reported. This includes those with fever and influenzalike
illness, such as cough and sore throat. However, Cetron said they were looking
for serious illnesses, not everyone with a cold
Were not talking about quarantining anybody for a
sniffle or a cough alone. Thats really not going to be the case and it
has not occurred, Cetron said.
The Department of Health and Human Services has authority to
isolate and quarantine anyone against the importation of nine infectious
diseases: pandemic influenza, cholera, yellow fever, plague, smallpox,
infectious tuberculosis, diphtheria, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)
and viral hemorrhagic fevers. The proposed rules empower authorities to hold a
person for up to three days. Thereafter, they must decide whether to quarantine
the person. In addition, the person has a right for a hearing before an
independent arbiter.
These tools have been long used as part of the public health
toolbox for centuries, and typically public health recommendations are made as
recommendations and are requested on a voluntary basis for compliance. In the
vast majority of cases, whether it is individuals or in population groups,
voluntary compliance with public health recommendations is all that is needed
to assure public safety.
In rare circumstances, public health authorities principally
at the state and local level have the legal power through state regulations to
compel or to order compulsory compliance with isolation or quarantine as a
public health tool, Cetron said.
Cetron added that the new proposals result from the SARS pandemic
in 2003, when the CDC had difficulty finding and alerting passengers who had
been on flights with suspected case-patients. Cetron said it highlighted
our global gaps as well as our global strengths and abilities to respond to
these threats.
The electronic manifests would make it easier to perform
trace-backs.
In the United States where the impact of this disease was
minimized, we had a policy of rapid isolation of suspect cases that met a
compatible case definition for SARS as defined by the World Health
Organization, which was the illness profile in conjunction with an
epidemiologic link with a transmission area, and we very much used rapid
detection and rapid isolation along with heightened surveillance through
passenger notifications.
During this period, CDC staff were present at 25 points of
entry, meeting every flight arriving from an impact area directly or one stop
indirectly and handing out yellow notification cards in what symptoms to look
for and how to rapidly respond to the emergence of those symptoms over the
incubation period of SARS, Cetron said. So the general policy was
early detection, rapid isolation and containment, and we did not have a federal
policy of using quarantine of contacts as part of our containment strategy at
the federal level during the SARS epidemic in 2003.
The proposals are being published in the Federal
Register and will be open for public comment. The public comment period
will last 60 days from Nov. 30. |