|
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
February 2008 Results from a study involving Utah residents who died of influenza during the last 100 years found that both close and distant relatives of those individuals also had a significantly increased risk for dying of influenza. The results support the existence of a heritable contribution to the predisposition toward death due to influenza. Familial clusters of infection are thought to be a consequence of shared exposure, the researchers wrote. Inherited host factors that also could account for the variability of illness and familial clustering include increased susceptibility to infection, decreased ability to control infection and/or an ineffective immune response. Generally, identification of genetic contributors to influenza is difficult due to high rates of infectivity and a low case-fatality rate. The Utah Population Data Base (UPDB), which includes genealogical data for the original Utah pioneers, provided researchers a method for tracking influenza-related genetic contributions. The UPDBs genealogical data have been record-linked to disease data for Utah; this includes death certificates dating from 1904. Among the more than 2 million individuals tracked within the UPDB, 388,221 had a death certificate available. Of those, influenza was listed as the cause of death for 4,855 individuals between 1904 and 2004. The genetic relationships among these individuals were analyzed in order to describe the familiality of death due to influenza, the researchers wrote. The study results found that relative risks for death due to influenza were significantly higher among all first-degree relatives (siblings, parents, children), considered both collectively and separately. There were 638 deaths due to influenza among all first-degree relatives vs. an expected number of 413.12 (RR=1.54; 95% CI, 1.42-1.67). The researchers wrote, however, that the elevated relative risk among first-degree relatives cannot distinguish between shared genetics or shared effects of environment or exposure to virus. Thus, an analysis was also conducted for more distant relatives. Both second-degree (grandparents and grandchildren, avuncular relatives) and third-degree (first cousins) relatives had significantly increased risk for death due to influenza. There were 1,090 deaths among second-degree relatives vs. 897.0 expected deaths (RR=1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29), and 1,446 deaths among third-degree relatives vs. 1,241.9 expected deaths (RR=1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.23). A further analysis aimed at discriminating between environmental and genetic effects compared the relative risks of relatives of individuals dying of influenza with the relative risks of the relatives of spouses of individuals dying of influenza. For each type of relative (sibling, parent, grandparent and third-degree), the relative risk was higher for the relatives of the individual than the relatives of the spouse of the individual (See table). These results were corroborated when the researchers showed significantly higher average relatedness among individuals dying of influenza.
|
![]()